<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SecurityCritics.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securitycritics.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securitycritics.org</link>
	<description>Truthful, independent criticism of the computer security industrial complex</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:04:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New USCENTCOM network policy punishes the innocent by Rob Rosenberger</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2012/07/04/horst/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rosenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=1283#comment-200</guid>
		<description>General Horst himself signed the cover letter releasing the document I requested under FOIA.  He redacted only one item, claiming it is &quot;a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy&quot; to divulge the phone number for his J6/IA shop.  I typically contest these things given the fact a headquarters function has no right to &quot;personal privacy&quot; for its official phone number.  But in this case it&#039;s the *only* thing Horst redacted, so I&#039;ll keep it just to demonstrate the stupidity of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>General Horst himself signed the cover letter releasing the document I requested under FOIA.  He redacted only one item, claiming it is &#8220;a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy&#8221; to divulge the phone number for his J6/IA shop.  I typically contest these things given the fact a headquarters function has no right to &#8220;personal privacy&#8221; for its official phone number.  But in this case it&#8217;s the *only* thing Horst redacted, so I&#8217;ll keep it just to demonstrate the stupidity of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U.S. antivirus industry is Iran&#8217;s new &#8220;BFF&#8221; by Rob Rosenberger</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2010/11/18/iran/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rosenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 03:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=1221#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Symantec&#039;s involvement forces me to ask two &lt;em&gt;disturbing&lt;/em&gt; questions.  First: how, exactly, did Symantec acquire a TS/SCI fully operational SCADA laboratory capable of analyzing Stuxnet&#039;s nuclear-specific payload?  Second: when did computer virus expert Eric Chien become a renowned &quot;DoE Q-cleared&quot; nuclear SCADA expert?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Symantec&#8217;s involvement forces me to ask two <em>disturbing</em> questions.  First: how, exactly, did Symantec acquire a TS/SCI fully operational SCADA laboratory capable of analyzing Stuxnet&#8217;s nuclear-specific payload?  Second: when did computer virus expert Eric Chien become a renowned &#8220;DoE Q-cleared&#8221; nuclear SCADA expert?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We have met the enemy, and he is USB by Rob Rosenberger</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2010/09/01/lynn/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rosenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=964#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Further reading:
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;SecurityWeek&lt;/cite&gt;: &lt;a target=press href=&quot;http://www.securityweek.com/defense-departments-cyberwar-credibility-gap&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Defense Department’s Cyberwar Credibility Gap&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Wired.com&lt;/cite&gt; Danger room: &lt;a target=press href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/08/insiders-doubt-2008-pentagon-hack-was-foreign-spy-attack/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Insiders Doubt 2008 Pentagon Hack Was Foreign Spy Attack&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; 
&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further reading:</p>
<ol>
<li><cite>SecurityWeek</cite>: <a target=press href="http://www.securityweek.com/defense-departments-cyberwar-credibility-gap" rel="nofollow">Defense Department’s Cyberwar Credibility Gap</a></li>
<li><cite>Wired.com</cite> Danger room: <a target=press href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/08/insiders-doubt-2008-pentagon-hack-was-foreign-spy-attack/" rel="nofollow">Insiders Doubt 2008 Pentagon Hack Was Foreign Spy Attack</a></li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We have met the enemy, and he is USB by Rob Rosenberger</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2010/09/01/lynn/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rosenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 02:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=964#comment-191</guid>
		<description>...and see &lt;a target=vmyths href=&quot;http://vmyths.com/2008/08/10/usaf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt; to learn how &lt;em&gt;easily&lt;/em&gt; the military can be conned into fratricide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and see <a target=vmyths href="http://vmyths.com/2008/08/10/usaf" rel="nofollow">this link</a> to learn how <em>easily</em> the military can be conned into fratricide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8221;The need for computer security outweighs the profit of copyrights&#8221; by Rob Rosenberger</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2009/08/17/copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rosenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=775#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Journalist Wayne Rash noticed &lt;a target=_blank href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/31/AR2009073102476.html?hpid=opinionsbox1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an opinion piece&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;cite&gt;Washington Post&lt;/cite&gt; titled &quot;The Death of Journalism.&quot;  Well worth the read.  You&#039;ll realize computer security mailing lists are part of the problem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalist Wayne Rash noticed <a target=_blank href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/31/AR2009073102476.html?hpid=opinionsbox1" rel="nofollow">an opinion piece</a> in the <cite>Washington Post</cite> titled &#8220;The Death of Journalism.&#8221;  Well worth the read.  You&#8217;ll realize computer security mailing lists are part of the problem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8221;The need for computer security outweighs the profit of copyrights&#8221; by Rob Rosenberger</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2009/08/17/copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rosenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=775#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Radvanovsky&#039;s rationalization makes me wonder what excuse he&#039;ll come up with for Dan Goodin at The Register.  &quot;Bob, stop reprinting my stories like you did on 10 July.&quot;  And I wonder what he&#039;ll say to an editor at Govt&#039; Computer News.  &quot;Sir, stop reprinting our stories like you did on 18 May.&quot;  And I wonder how he&#039;d react to Janet Raloff at U.S. News &amp; World Report.  &quot;Dude, stop reprinting my stories like you did on 28 July...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radvanovsky&#8217;s rationalization makes me wonder what excuse he&#8217;ll come up with for Dan Goodin at The Register.  &#8220;Bob, stop reprinting my stories like you did on 10 July.&#8221;  And I wonder what he&#8217;ll say to an editor at Govt&#8217; Computer News.  &#8220;Sir, stop reprinting our stories like you did on 18 May.&#8221;  And I wonder how he&#8217;d react to Janet Raloff at U.S. News &#038; World Report.  &#8220;Dude, stop reprinting my stories like you did on 28 July&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From the &#8220;we don&#8217;t make this up&#8221; dept: by Rob Rosenberger</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2008/04/28/goza/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rosenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=8#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Amazing catch, FMJohnson!  Yet another reason for Rob Goza to wince...  I wish I&#039;d caught that error myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing catch, FMJohnson!  Yet another reason for Rob Goza to wince&#8230;  I wish I&#8217;d caught that error myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From the &#8220;we don&#8217;t make this up&#8221; dept: by FMJohnson</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2008/04/28/goza/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>FMJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=8#comment-145</guid>
		<description>&#039;The illustrative segue that brings “Mighty Eighth” alumni Jimmy Stewart into the picture (literally);&#039;

Even worse, Jimmy Stewart wasn&#039;t in &quot;North by Northwest&quot;; that was Cary Grant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The illustrative segue that brings “Mighty Eighth” alumni Jimmy Stewart into the picture (literally);&#8217;</p>
<p>Even worse, Jimmy Stewart wasn&#8217;t in &#8220;North by Northwest&#8221;; that was Cary Grant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oops!  McAfee expert slanders Armadillo, Themida by Joris Evers</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2009/05/29/mcafee-2/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Joris Evers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=641#comment-134</guid>
		<description>A quick note from McAfee. The Muttik blog post is online as you noticed in your update, it was taken offline briefly just for a couple of additions. 
Joris Evers
McAfee PR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick note from McAfee. The Muttik blog post is online as you noticed in your update, it was taken offline briefly just for a couple of additions.<br />
Joris Evers<br />
McAfee PR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oops!  McAfee expert slanders Armadillo, Themida by Rob Rosenberger</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2009/05/29/mcafee-2/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rosenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 09:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=641#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Update.  My RSS feed reader did something unusual: it retrieved a duplicate feed for Igor Muttik&#039;s column, as if it had been re-published.  A similar duplicate feed occurred for Guilherme Venere&#039;s column &quot;A closer look at Swine Flu spam&quot; (originally?) published on 1 May.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update.  My RSS feed reader did something unusual: it retrieved a duplicate feed for Igor Muttik&#8217;s column, as if it had been re-published.  A similar duplicate feed occurred for Guilherme Venere&#8217;s column &#8220;A closer look at Swine Flu spam&#8221; (originally?) published on 1 May.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
