<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SecurityCritics.org &#187; NextGov</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securitycritics.org/tag/nextgov/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securitycritics.org</link>
	<description>Truthful, independent criticism of the computer security industrial complex</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Part 2: USAF CIO on hiatus, or what?</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2008/12/03/milcio-2/</link>
		<comments>http://securitycritics.org/2008/12/03/milcio-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rosenberger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dionysius AFB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Brewin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erik Holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Andrew Prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lexington Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loren Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marina Malenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NextGov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shreveport Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USAF CIO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>{Updated 8 Dec 08}</em> The USAF CIO, Lt. General Michael Peterson, finally updated his stag&#173;nant web&#173;site &#8212; with five <em>civilian</em> news&#173;paper articles.  First of all, did he obtain the reprint rights, or is this a blatant copy&#173;right viola&#173;tion?  And second, why didn't he high&#173;light some of USAF's many <em>organic</em> press releases...?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitycritics.org/2008/12/03/milcio-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press reports: &#8220;AFCYBER may be its own worst enemy&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://securitycritics.org/2008/08/14/afcyber/</link>
		<comments>http://securitycritics.org/2008/08/14/afcyber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rosenberger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dionysius AFB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFCYBER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NextGov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Register]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitycritics.org/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone <em>way</em> high up in the Pentagon has put the birth of Air Force Cyberspace Command on hold.  Is USAF its own worst enemy, as the media speculates?  Actually, no &#8212; it's the bureaucrats who want their agencies to reorganize <em>under</em> a cyberspace command for self-serving reasons...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://securitycritics.org/2008/08/14/afcyber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
